[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
Re: [archhurd-devel] [PATCH] get rid of libexec
To
:
devel@archhurd.org
Subject
: Re: [archhurd-devel] [PATCH] get rid of libexec
From
: Alexander Preisinger <
alexander.preisinger@gmail.com
>
Date
: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 14:41:12 +0200
Delivered-to
:
devel@mail.archhurd.org
Dkim-signature
: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=6BJ8XCT78HGW6p9xdgJalcqlxh6k3wRDUeFcghkykoE=; b=esZqsml42BCUpWrBS+BocqqpbelrYjWoFI5JjoTNmebGTH238gefveBEB0/rktGRax JEbwKsfeaFlm0HYpPxEwQH0jM8Jes4mbK+izgBduM4+HXrPcV9B7ktgfnTNng+zPVxyU cJXO2J6tp+e3ZB4G9lZlD/zi+cJ9Pju0mJegE=
Domainkey-signature
: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=ZUkCUVyfjh8Mpe+BdxW7r9d4Qs8MfrQ3h5glW2KWfw3wv9k7euB6vuTp860N21T+Rp am9ebY0ZoMyFks1ravcKDn+IeLxKfBKzmVPFbw2LHQWNCf4SC1EGXIiyHwcxQ8OHYcBW 1AibWA51KZU+HNbzGi+lBbZR+mtX3HO3bUXH8=
In-reply-to
: <
AANLkTine6gWef=LzctNMONq7t6EtnKZC8efEnpJp_-SM@mail.gmail.com
>
References
: <
AANLkTi=gaKV8CSrKiuKfdTwpd4sLvRy8sNqE9aS5FZEq@mail.gmail.com
> <
AANLkTine6gWef=LzctNMONq7t6EtnKZC8efEnpJp_-SM@mail.gmail.com
>
Reply-to
:
devel@archhurd.org
Well, I was bored. >_> I only wanted to suggest that we could do that.
References
:
[archhurd-devel] [PATCH] get rid of libexec
From:
Alexander Preisinger <alexander.preisinger@gmail.com>
Re: [archhurd-devel] [PATCH] get rid of libexec
From:
Matthias Lanzinger <mlaenz@gmail.com>
Prev by Date:
Re: [archhurd-devel] [PATCH] get rid of libexec
Next by Date:
Re: [archhurd-devel] Setup assitant chosse mount point ... Bug?
Previous by thread:
Re: [archhurd-devel] [PATCH] get rid of libexec
Next by thread:
[archhurd-devel] JKProcFS
Index(es):
Date
Thread