[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [archhurd-devel] /bin/login issues
- To: devel@archhurd.org
- Subject: Re: [archhurd-devel] /bin/login issues
- From: Stephen Gilles <stephendgilles@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 20:20:04 -0400
- Delivered-to: devel@mail.archhurd.org
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=9KRttEMCR+sjL4Fux7E28UazGCbxSt4TG4lOn5TwpvI=; b=nEFxiMDLvq2ax1BpVd9s17uyy5u1bSruBqrzTL1fswZ57mX9qVw05xJHgJQuEwYgwV wbdVsZaDW2s13s//s+zi0UuEV2whtYAUzhSVPgKlAdN3NyeEWjYnVRQc9igq5ykkJO7Y jF8nQc/hl0wpOBf0hsKE0veEsfLsdB1UQyuos=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=it3YLWfl/OYYgla1ABxhupxyddlidu2a3+KCxtTmOdqT60skOhPDCIEDcKIkyXIxE9 NvnehD3XwGGapPmpl9QR0biA5lzDXP+E5VPBkiEtPCW7TbFH5DVul9eJLOCrYJsOeAAc FA/aT4rTaaVPGFWb950vi/XQeEPHzhz70QoHY=
- In-reply-to: <AANLkTim8U3KMLWeNVNn45ji9Y8tLXssEOH7cJk8pyXrY@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <AANLkTim8U3KMLWeNVNn45ji9Y8tLXssEOH7cJk8pyXrY@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: devel@archhurd.org
> So opinions on changing the default login binary?
I vote for changing the /bin/login to the shadow version. It was cool
having a shell, but as has been pointed out, it's too much of a
security risk. I don't think we should recommend compiling shadow and
editing pacman.conf just to remove a security risk.