[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [archhurd-devel] Re: [signoff] libtool 2.2.10-1





On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Alexander Preisinger <alexander.preisinger@gmail.com> wrote:
2010/6/22 Stephen Gilles <stephendgilles@gmail.com>:
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Alexander Preisinger
> <alexander.preisinger@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> 2010/6/22 Stephen Gilles <stephendgilles@gmail.com>:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Jordan Roy <info@jordanroy.net> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I'm sorry for my noobishness, but does that "signoff" thing is about?
>> >>
>> >> Jordan
>> >
>> > I believe it refers to the end of discussion about a particular step in
>> > development (in this case, rebuilding libtool).  All activity by
>> > Alexander's
>> > part has ceased - he is 'signing off' of further work on this.  In
>> > practice,
>> > this usually means that he is either releasing it to the repos or
>> > waiting
>> > for a higher authority to pick up his work and move it from there -
>> > probably
>> > the former.
>> >
>>
>> WTF?
>>
>> You should subscribe to the arch-devel-public list.
>>
>> Its a mail about a new package in testing which is waiting to be moved
>> to core or extra.
>>
>> You test it and then you answer with "Signoff i686" or "signoff
>> x86_64" in ArchLinux
>>
>
> Isn't that what I said?  I was trying to explain the general principle of a
> signoff.
>

No offense.

None taken.
 
Sorry if I got you wrong, i am not a native speaker.

No worries - your answer was more practical anyway.
 
>>
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 19:05:50 +0200
>> >> Alexander Preisinger <alexander.preisinger@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > libtool 2.2.10-2 out now
>> >> >
>> >> > gcc rebuild
>> >> >
>> >> > 2010/6/20 Alexander Preisinger <alexander.preisinger@gmail.com>:
>> >> > > works fine for me
>> >> > >
>> >> > > signoff
>> >> > >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>